Is it possible for an individual or group to understand himself without the other? Can man dispense with the other, or the relationship between the self and the other, from the complex relationships at the individual and collective levels, so that the self can be understood only by understanding the other? The relationship between the self, whatever the title of its definition, is in need of the other, regardless of its title and definition.
If the title of the self is religious, this self needs to understand itself and to live properly with the other religious. If the title of the self is national, ethnic or sectarian, it is impossible for this self to realize the realities of life without weaving relations with each other. The other with all its circles is the mirror of the self in all its circles. Understand and understand the other and understand his needs and requirements. The other is the mirror of the self, not the real without the real one. Therefore, we believe in a philosophical and knowledge that all calls to dispense with others, whatever their justifications, pretexts or addresses, are calls incompatible with the norms of human life ..
The calls for the denial and eradication of the other have not led and will only lead to the dissolution of the self in all its peculiarities and direct and indirect aspects.
Therefore, we see that all the ideologies and tendencies and purgatory, has only led to the further emergence of sub-identities and privacy to be obliterated and absent.
Therefore, the religious other is an existential necessity of the religious self. And the other sectarian is an existential necessity and knowledge of self-doctrinal and so the rest of the titles and circles of belonging that determine the meaning of the self and the other .. The self that did not exceed the limits on one of the words of the Egyptian writer Samir Morcos, no matter how rich this self and whatever the experience, It is difficult for these boundaries to cross from the possibility that the other may have richness and experience that the self has not known or understood, and that the persistence of the self in existence depends to a great extent on the test of the richness and experience of interacting or discovering at least what The other on the other.
The other by definition is heterogeneous, and remains an area that needs to be understood.
The self in the process of going out to the other discovery but rediscover itself, and may begin to recognize. The self can not be self-possessed except by the presence of the other.
Those who seek to discover themselves, and to know their value and cultural system, must communicate with the values of others and their cultural systems.
Isolation and withdrawal do not lead to self-discovery, even if the option of isolation is an ideological choice.
The narcissistic view of the self, its values, and its principles and knowledge do not lead to the understanding and understanding of the cultural and moral reality. This is because the narcissistic tendency in man leads to a false feeling of dispensing with all their knowledge and scientific and cultural gains. It is not isolation that leads to understanding and self-discovery, and dispensing with others, self-centeredness and self-centeredness leads not to discovery, but to a stereotypical image of the self, unable to awaken man and discover his potential. Only communication and openness leads to self-discovery. From here we come to an important social and cultural reality. That isolation and retreat are not the means of civilizational and cultural defense of the self; they are considered as a means of escaping the present entitlements. History has not recorded a human experience of a society that has managed to preserve its rewards and maintain its gains through retreat and isolation. Good openness and scientific, cultural and social communication, between different expressions and components, remain the means of self-defense. Sticking to constants and defending privacy can not be achieved by self-closure, but by openness and constant communication with the other. Whatever the differences and points of disagreement, there is no real justification for withdrawal and isolation. On the contrary, it is entirely true ... Religious, doctrinal and ideological differences can not be managed without the differences between the two.
For this, we deeply believe that self-discovery requires attention to the following:
The human being no matter what posses the potential, competencies and energies, can not achieve itself and enhance the public gains, without weaving normal relations and level with the social, cultural and national environment ..
A normal person can not do without others, but it is necessary to weave relations together with them. There is no doubt that the gateway to this process is openness, communication and cooperation with others.
http://afrogfx.com/Appspoilcy/com.afrogfx.Selfdiscovery-privacy_policy.html
